Instructional Video

(copy and paste this worksheet in Word to submit assignment digitally)


Name _______________________________  URL to view and grade your work ____

Topic/URL ______________________       Share this video with the class

 

 

 

 

 



Grading Rubric Project 2

Instructional Video

Student Name: _______________________________ Presentation Topic ______________________

URL where found:

Worksheet & Planning Document submitted for grade?  Yes       No
Presented to class?   Yes       No

 

CATEGORY

4

3

2

1

REVIEWER'S #

GRADE (1-4)

Credits/References

Beautifully presented in the proper format, with everything accounted for

Looks pretty good.

There are a few references. Doesn’t look very special

Missing from presentation

 

instructions

Strong awareness of instructing.

One can clearly explain why the author chose the, audio and graphics

Some evidence of instruction.

One can mostly explain why the author chose the, audio and graphics

Some awareness of audience in the design. Students find it difficult to explain how the vocabulary, audio and graphics chosen fit the target audience.

Limited awareness of the interests of the target audience.

 

Grammar

Grammar and usage were correct (for the dialect chosen) and contributed to clarity, style and character development.

Grammar and usage were typically correct (for the dialect chosen) and errors did not detract from the story.

Grammar and usage were typically correct but errors detracted from story.

Repeated errors in grammar and usage distracted greatly from the story.

 

Soundtrack - Emotion

Music and narration stirs a rich emotional response that matches the topic

Music or narration stirs a rich emotional response that somewhat matches the topic

Music or narration is ok, and not distracting, but it does not add much

Music or narration is distracting, inappropriate, OR was not used.

 

Duration of Presentation & detail

Length of presentation was 2+ minutes, just right detail

Length of presentation was less than 2 minutes, good detail.

Length of presentation was short, with little detail.

Presentation was wimpy & detail poor