ANNUAL
PROFESSIONAL
PERFORMANCE REVIEW
Teacher Evaluation and Growth System
Reference Document
[Click here for a printable version of this document]
Prepared by:
Annual Professional Performance Review Committee
Madrid-Waddington Central School
PO Box 67
Madrid, New York 13660
Board Approved August 2007
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION .1
PHILOSOPHY AND PURPOSE ....1
TEACHER PERFORMANCE CRITERIA 2
(Evaluation Criteria)
TEACHER EVALUATION PERFORMANCE TIMELINE ...3
*Annual Professional Review Plan
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - PROPOSAL FORM A- 1
APPENDIX B - CLASSROOM OBSERVATION FORM ...B-1
APPENDIX C - PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION FORM C-1
APPENDIX D - EVALUATION PLAN . ..D-1
APPENDIX E - PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN ..F- 1
APPENDIX F - REFLECTION ... E -1
APPENDIX G -ARTIFACT . G-1
APPENDIX H - LESSON PLAN FORMAT ..H-1
Introduction
The Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) is section 100.2 of the New York State Education Commissioners Regulations which require that all teachers providing instructional or pupil personnel services be evaluated. The regulation is entitled the Annual Professional Performance Review. The evaluation must incorporate the NYS Performance Indicators and included improving student achievement, employee skills, and employee knowledge.
The information in this manual provides evaluators and teachers a description of the summative evaluation instruments and summary of procedures. The manual includes three primary evaluative instruments for teacher growth and progress: (1) Classroom Observation (2) Professional Evaluation (3) Annual Professional Goal
The forms and copies of the manual can be downloaded from the following website:
_________________.
Philosophy and Purpose
Effective evaluation is an integral component in the process of improving teaching and learning. The two purposes of the teacher evaluation process are: (a) accountability and quality assurance (b) professional growth. The evaluation and supervision of certified personnel is to promote ongoing professional growth and performance which improves student learning. It is the belief that the evaluative process should be a collaborative effort between the evaluators and the person being evaluated. It is suggested that each teacher develop an Annual Professional Goal.
Teacher Performance Criteria
Teacher Evaluation Timeline
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Annual Professional Goal: It is suggested that all teachers will develop a personal goal to enhance student learning and achievement based on the criteria for performance. This is not a formal evaluation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-tenured Teachers:
A non-tenured teacher will receive three observations year one, two year two and one year three (as per MWCS contract section 22).
A non-tenured teacher may receive one evaluation per year.
Tenured Teachers:
An evaluation will be conducted each year. The administrator has the prerogative to
conduct a form of evaluation at his or her discretion.
A tenured teacher should be observed by an administrator every three years. For the other two years of the cycle, the teacher may choose another form of
evaluation (see below).
Evaluation Plan Options:
-Individual Professional Growth Plan
A tenured teacher develops a growth plan for enhancing student learning based
on the criteria for performance. The teacher may work with a colleague.
-Self-evaluation (with videotape option)
-Collaboration with peers -Peer observation
-NYS peer review -Special Project
-Other___________________
A tenured teacher may receive one professional evaluation per year.
FALL: By the end of SEPTEMBER each teacher will submit his/her plans (see Appendix A) for an annual evaluation choice for review and discussion. By the end of OCTOBER each teacher will have met with his/her administrator to discuss goals and evaluation plans.
SPRING: There will be an end of the year review with an agreed upon date by teacher and administrator after Spring Break in APRIL. Every attempt will be made to meet with administrators to discuss year-end reviews before finals week in JUNE. Teachers are encouraged to complete the Reflection form (Appendix F) before the final review meeting with your administrator. (Note: This will not be put in your personnel file unless you want it to be included.)
School year _____
Madrid-Waddington Central School
EVALUATION PROPOSAL FORM
Teacher: ____________________________ Date: _______
*By the end of SEPTEMBER each teacher will submit his or her Annual
Professsional Goal and evaluation choice for the year.
*By the end of OCTOBER the teacher will meet with administrator to discuss the
plan/evaluation.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Evaluation Option: _______
A. Classroom Observation
B. Evaluation Plan (check one below)
____Individual Professional Growth Plan
(You will take one aspect of your IPGP and have that piece formally evaluated.)
____Self-evaluation (with videotape option)
____Collaboration with peers
____NYS peer review
____Peer observation
____Special Project
____Other _____________________________________
C. Professional Evaluation
2. Annual Professional Goal (briefly describe):
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
School year _______
Madrid-Waddington Central School
Professional Evaluation
Teachers name: _______________________________ Position: _______________
Evaluators name: _____________________________ Position: _______________
Certification area: _________________ Tenured: _____ Probationary: _____
RATING SCALE
(1)Exceptional = Used to identify outstanding or exceptional performance.
(2) Meets Standards = Demonstrates strength in these areas and meets NYS performance indicators.
(3) Needs Improvement = Does not meet NYS performance indicators; demonstrates a need for improvement.
PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES:
_______ Maintains effective records of student progress.
_______ Exhibits effective organizational skills.
_______ Punctual with reports, grades, records, and reporting to work on time.
_______ Responds professionally to administrative requests and directions.
_______ Performs assigned duties.
_______ Establishes collaborative relationships with students, parents and colleagues, as needed,
to meet the learning needs of the student.
_______ Participates in professional development.
_______ Completes IPGP (Individual Professional Goal Plan) for the year
_______ Completes evaluative option review with administrator
PROFESSIONAL ATTRIBUTES:
______ Commands respect by example in appearance, manner, behavior, and language.
______ Demonstrates a positive, professional attitude.
______ Interacts effectively with students, colleagues, and parents and exhibits appropriate
interactive skills.
______ Adapts to new situations and ideas.
______ Meets difficult situations effectively with sound judgment.
______ Demonstrates the ability to initiate and implement tasks.
______ Exhibits professional growth and demonstrates reflective practices.
______ Demonstrates progress in utilizing current technology to enhance professional practices.
COMMENTS
A. STRENGTHS:
B. AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT:
C. RECOMMENDATIONS:
D. ACHIEVEMENTS and/or RECOGNITIONS:
This is a confidential report and the confidential nature of this report is to be respected by all parties.
_________________________ Addendum Attached
Signature of Employee Date
Yes ____ No ____
________________________________ ______________
Signature of Evaluator Date
School year _____
Madrid -Waddington Central School
Performance Improvement Plan
Teacher: _________________________ Date: ________
Evaluator: _______________________ Date: ________
This outlines your Performance Improvement Plan to assist you in addressing the identified standards of needs improvement.
Criteria (s) Needing Improvement:
Improvement Objectives:
Plan for Improvement:
I have the read and discussed the Performance Improvement Plan report.
________________________ ________ I have _____
Signature of Teacher Date
I have not _____ attached written comments.
___________________________ ________
Signature of Evaluator Date
School year ____
Madrid-Waddington Central School
Artifact
(Optional)
Teacher: _________________________________ Date: ____________
*An artifact is any item that you would like to include that recognizes your efforts toward enhanced student learning, professional growth and special achievements. These could include: collaborative learning units, newspaper articles, parent letters, grants, workshops, special achievements or recognitions, etc.
Artifact Included:
How is it aligned with Performance Criteria (s)?
Teacher Performance Criteria (check all that apply):
_____ Content Knowledge _____ Classroom Management
_____ Preparation _____ Student Development
_____ Instructional Delivery _____ Student Assessment
_____ Collaboration _____ Technology
_____ Reflective and Responsive Practice
Description of Item:
Reason for Inclusion of Artifact:
MADRID-WADDINGTON CENTRAL SCHOOL
TEACHER EVALUATION TRACKING FORM
TEACHERS NAME:_______________________________________________
|
Review Year |
Classroom Observation |
Professional Evaluation |
Individual Professional Growth Plan |
Evaluation Option |
Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
School year ________
Madrid-Waddington Central School
REFLECTION
Teacher: _________________________________ Date: ________________
Based on my professional practice and my observations of student learning
|
What should I do more of?
Because
|
What should I do less of?
Because |
|
What new things could I do?
Because |
What should I stop doing?
Because |
What am I most proud of this school year?
Because
© 2006 The Alberta Teachers Association
School year _____
Madrid-Waddington Central School
EVALUATION OPTION PLAN
Name: _____________________________________ Date ___________
Position: ___________________________________
Choose an area for growth from Teacher Performance Indicators and design an Individual Professional Growth Plan to enhance your development in this area.
|
Professional Goal (Indicate the performance indicator(s)each goal addresses) |
|
Rationale Why did you choose to enhance your growth in this area? |
|
Action Plan Describe the actions you plan to take to accomplish this goal, including a timeline. |
|
Expected Benefits Describe the educational benefits you expect to gain from this Individual Professional Growth Plan. Student objectives are appropriate to discuss here. |
Fall: Spring:
________________________________ ________________________
Teacher Signature/Date Teacher Signature/Date
________________________________ _________________________
Evaluators Signature/Date Evaluators Signature/Date
|
Outcomes Achieved:
|
|
Areas for Improvement:
|
|
Recommendations:
|
This is a confidential report and the confidential nature of this report is to be respected by all parties.
_______________________________ Date: _______ Addendum attached
Signature of Teacher
Yes ___ No ____
_______________________________ Date: _______
Signature of Evaluator
LESSON PLAN FORMAT
*This is a suggested format. It is understood that teachers have varied ways of planning their lessons.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Teacher: ____________________________________ Date: ______
Grade Level: ___________________
Subject: ________________________
Suggested Time Allowance: _________
Description of Lesson: _______________________________________
Objectives: The students will: __________________________________________
Goals: _____________________________________________________
*The goals should include NYS Standards (Which ones apply? Are they interdisciplinary?
Activities/Procedure: _______________________________________________
*This might include a warm-up activity, guiding questions and a closure activity.
Resources/Materials Needed: _______________________________
Method of Evaluation/Assessment: ___________________________
How do you know your students met the objective of the lesson?
School year ______
Madrid-Waddington Central School
Teachers name: ____________________________ Position: ___________________
Evaluators name: ___________________________ Position: ___________________
Certification area: ___________________________ Tenured: ______ Probationary: ______
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRE-OBSERVATION COMMUNICATION ____ Written ____ Verbal Date: _____
A. Classroom Observed: ___________________________________ Date/Time: _______
B. Teacher Objectives for Lesson (see attached)
RATING SCALE
Exceptional = Used to identify outstanding or exceptional performance.
Meets Standards = Demonstrates strength in these areas and meets NYS performance indicators.
Needs Improvement = Does not meet NYS performance indicators; demonstrates a need for improvement.
|
I |
PLANNING and ORGANIZATION
|
Exceptional |
Meets Standards |
Needs Improvement |
COMMENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
relevant for the aims of the lesson and the level of the student.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
definite beginning and end around which the activities are organized.
|